|
I have found the 22-fold (geometric) 'Woodborough Hill' (UK)crop formation .. a magnificent and obviously-genuine one
..to be *directly, specifically, and precisely* connected ..in terms of Grid POINT Values .. simultaneously to ..both Chartres Cathedral and to the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau.
Here is the equation .. simply involving the 3 Grid POINT Values
(M.L. Morton) .. 6.283185307 / 1.273239545 = 4.934802201
I've already sent you email(s) showing my calculations for the matrix' numbers of
Chartres Cathedral (quite recently) ..and I've had the 'matrix' numbers of the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau
on The Internet for over 2 years now.
Here, in this piece .. I'll give you my 'matrix' numbers for
this 'Woodborough Hill' crop formation (UK, year-2000 season).
(Approximate coordinates were given to me via email by UK researcher Freddy Silva) ..
Grid LAT 51 (deg) X 21 (min) X 2.006154745 (sec) North .. = 2148.591732 North ..
= 37.5 X Radian (deg). { Note: Radian (deg) = (360 / 2Pi) = 57.29577951 deg }.
Grid LONG 32 (deg) X 57 (min) X 5.812979828 (sec) W.Giza .. = 10602.87521 W.Giza ..
= 3375 X Pi. { Note: using precisely 3.141592654 for the Pi constant }.[ W.Greenwich 01 deg 49 min 5.012979828 sec ].
Grid POINT Value 10602.87521 / 2148.591732 = 4.934802201
Note: "4.934802201" is exactly HALF of .. (Pi Squared). { 9.869604401 / 2 = 4.934802201 }.
ALSO .. "4.934802201" is exactly ..
Pi X (1/2 Pi). { 3.141592654 X 1.570796327 = 4.934802201 }.
There is an excellent article and analysis of this crop formation with some *good graphics* .. by Freddy Silva (a top researcher in the UK) at ..
http://www.lovely.clara.net/crop_circles_history00d.html
Please go there .. use that URL.
I received an email from Sharon Pacione, another researcher into the crop formation phenomenon, regarding this particular
formation. I am 'pasting' most of Sharon's email here (following) :
<< Hi Everyone ..
The above crop circle design is so phenomenal that I wanted to share it with you. I also want to share that it
is IDENTICAL to the 'crown chakra' portion known as "Bija mantras". In the book "Music and Sound in the Healing Arts" by John Beaulieu, this formation is shown on page
107. (ISBN 0-88268-056-0, published in1987 by Station Hill Press).
Here is a quote from the book: ""Bija means 'seed'. The bijas of the chakra energy centers are those 'seeds of sound' that are
associated with the element of each chakra....The bija mantras are combinations of these seed sounds that evoke elemental archetypes for healing. There are thousands of possibilities for creating bija mantras."
Here is one additional quote also used in the book: "The bija-mantras are the most potent of all. They definitely belong to no language and are not found in any dictionary. They have no gender and declensions.
They are combinations of letters that represent the relationship between the
kundalini (life energy) and the Supreme Consciousness (Sacred Sound), and their specific rays (elemental archetypes)...An attempt to
understand them intellectually will be futile." ~~~~~~~(Usharbudh Arya)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SOUND, SOUND, SOUND...EVERYTHING IS SOUND....EVERYTHING IS BIRTHED BY SOUND!!! I
still say that one day we will KNOW that the authentic crop formations are created by the science of "CYMATICS".
I have come across some other information regarding possible meanings of some of the
formations that I will share in the near future. Hopefully, someone will put them in a book (geeze, I hope it's not me)!!!
In the spirit of oneness,Sharon444
(Sharon Pacione) >>
----------------------------------------
My thanks to Sharon Pacione for sharing her information and her comments, concerning this 'Woodborough Hill' crop formation (UK). I notice part of her quote (above) says,
"any attempt to understand this .. intellectually .. will be futile". Well .. I have to respectfully disagree there, with the author of that statement. I think we ARE making very significant progress in
"understanding this intellectually" .. through the very numbers I'm finding, and through these very specific, and very precise, correlations that I'm finding between crop formation locations, ancient
site/structure
locations, and certain circa 2000 A.D.star-positions in our sky .. relative to our ecliptic.
In the equation above, I have Chartres Cathedral and the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau directly
connected (their 'matrix' Grid POINTS) to this crop formation's centered, precise point-of-placement. We now know the design of this formation is that of certain "crown chakra" *healing
modalities*. Of course, this is involving ancient knowledge about healing .. about using *sound* for therapeutic purposes. In Laurence Gardner's work (see "Genesis of The Grail Kings")
he mentions the
ancient "Egyptian Therapeutate". I quote, here, from pages 126-127 of 'Genesis of The Grail Kings' : "Another of the most prominent mystery schools was the Great White
Brotherhood of Pharaoh Tuthmosis
III (circa 1450 B.C.) .. so-called, it is often said, because of their white raiment .. but 'actually' named because of their pre-occupation with a mysterious white powder. According to the Supreme Grand Lodge of
the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis, there were 39 men and women on the High Council of the Brotherhood, who sat at the Temple of Karnak in Luxor. A branch of this Order became more generally known as the
Egyptian Therapeutate, who, in Heliopolis and Judaea, were identified as the Essenes."
The Church at Rennes-le-Chateau and Chartres Cathedral are very associated with the Knights Templar, who in turn were
involved in preserving the knowledge and the legacy (and the actual bloodlines) associated with the descendants of Jesus Christ and Mary Magdalene. Laurence Gardner, in his work, has shown that Jesus Christ and
Mary Magdalene were, themselves, descendants of people who carried this ancient *knowledge and legacy* down through millennia of human history, from ancient Mesopotamia and from ancient Egypt.
Holger Isenberg
sent me the approximate coordinates for Chartres Cathedral, on the 31st of August, 2000. { Note: this was either the same day, or the day after, a *white dove* (rare for the area in Denmark where he lives)
attempted to actually fly-in through his window. As he reported, in an email on The Internet (recorded for posterity), when he looked at the time on a digital
clock .. just seconds after this white dove had tried to fly into his room .. the clock read; "19:47"}.
I went to the website Holger had used to get the approximate coordinates; http://www.mapblast.com
... and I entered "France" and "Chartres" in the appropriate boxes .. and there appeared a map (drawing/graphic) of an aerial view of the area of Chartres, France. I noticed a "very roughly-circular or oval" street .. surrounding the site of the Cathedral. Then, I noticed that this street is actually shaped .. *as seen from aerial view* .. very much like an actual human heart. This, I think, is quite significant. A research colleague of mine .. Joe Mason .. has written rather extensively on The Internet (
http://www.greatdreams.com)
about the human "heart chakra" and its importance in these very transitional times of circa 2000 A.D. And Joe Mason's writings on this "heart chakra" topic have been in relation to .. certain crop
formations !!
Dan Winter has written much about "Phi-nesting" .. directly correlating it with the human heart physiology itself. Of course .. this involves the Phi constant .. the 'Golden Section'
.. 1.618033989 .. which is exactly HALF the Cosine of 36 (deg). Freddy Silva has noted .. in his analysis of
this 'Woodborough Hill' crop formation ...{http://www.lovely.clara.net/crop_circles_history00d.html } ..
the Phi-based design elements in the '22-fold geometry' of the formation.
Do you realize what the odds must be .. for *this particular crop formation* to
have a Grid POINT Value actually 'precisely-equal-to' .. the exact ratio of the *precise* Grid POINT Values of the Church at Rennes-le-Chateau and Chartres Cathedral ? Do you realize that the Grid LAT and the Grid LONG
of *each* of these 3 locations .. must be "precisely what they are" ..
in terms of arc-degrees, arc-minutes, and *FRACTIONAL ARC-SECONDS* .. to form the equation I discovered here ?!!
Regarding SIRIUS ..
The other night on "Coast-to-Coast AM" .. Richard Hoagland mentioned SIRIUS and its importance relative to New Year's Eve at midnight on 1999/2000 .. in Washington, D.C. and at Giza.
And Robert Ghostwolf, on the same show, made a statement as to the "importance of mathematics" in 'what's happening' now. They were actually referring directly to what I have already written about on The
Internet.
If you go to my "Sky Matrix" section on the "Farshores" website ..
(http://www.farshore.force9.co.uk/skymat_1.htm) .. you will see my 'matrix' figures for
SIRIUS (Morton, 1999).
You will note its Grid POINT Value as .. 2.368705056 ..and its Grid LONG as .. "24805.02134" E.ALNITAK .. = 19 (deg) X 23 (min) X 56.76206256 (sec) E.ALNITAK. { ALNITAK being the
Orion belt-star serving as our ecliptical prime meridian 'marker' }. Notice the decimal harmonic reference to the Grid POINT Value (Munck, 1992) of The Great Pyramid of Giza (248.0502134) ..
as The Great Pyramid itself serves as Earth's prime meridian 'marker'.
(
http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/giza.html )
Then .. go to .. http://hometown.aol.com/marscode/cydonia.html
Those webpages will show you (graphically,
thanks to my friend and research associate Gary Val Tenuta) the prime meridians at both Giza and Cydonia. I've been able to confirm and to prove the theory of my friend Mary Anne Weaver .. as correct .. that is; that
ALNITAK is our ecliptical
prime meridian 'marker' for the longitude of certain prominent star-positions in our sky .. including SIRIUS, POLARIS, REGULUS, MINTAKA, ALNILAM, ALPHA DRACONIS, SPICA, VEGA, BETELGEUSE,
RIGEL, ARCTURUS, ALDEBARAN, MERAK, DUBHE, CASTOR, POLLUX, etc.
ALNITAK corresponds directly to The Great Pyramid, positionally .. as viewed from above (aerial view) and to the north of the Giza complex ..
to the ORION belt-stars in our sky as viewed from Earth, as Robert Bauval discovered around 1995. Mary Anne Weaver is the Ph.D. who wrote the brilliant and very comprehensive paper for Richard Hoagland,
almost one year ago
(October/November of 1999) as I write this, statistically proving that the Apollo and the pre-Apollo NASA programs were certainly following a definite pattern in their launches and in their
landings, according to certain *star-positions* as related to the horizons .. on Earth, on The Moon, and on Mars.
So .. getting back to SIRIUS. I now will multiply the Grid POINT Value of Sirius (Morton, 1999) by
the Grid POINT Value of this 'Woodborough Hill' crop formation ..
2.368705056 X 4.934802201 = Pi X 3.720753202
The figure "3.720753202" is a decimal harmonic of the *matrix format* figure of the base
slope angle of The Great Pyramid of Giza. Munck (1992) found this as .. 37207.53202 ...
= 51 (deg) X 51 (min) X 14.30508728 (sec).
The TANGENT (Munck, 1992) of this base slope angle is .. (4 / Pi) .. or .. 1.273239545
That figure .. exactly "1.273239545".. is the Grid POINT Value I just found recently (2 weeks ago, as I write
this) for Chartres Cathedral.
-------------------------------------------------------
Will Richard Hoagland Show My (Following) Equation ?
I have sent Richard Hoagland several emails
specifically-regarding the SIRIUS connections to Washington, D.C., to Giza, to the 'year-2000', and to the 'Sky Meridian'. { No .. the "Sky Meridian" is not the ecliptical prime meridian }. Please do not
confuse the two. He should be able to explain the difference between the two, at the upcoming "Santa Fe Conclave". Included in those emails to him, I have sent my equation which elegantly describes this
"SIRIUS connection" that he was referring-to on the "Coast-to-Coast AM" show the other night. I really do hope he intends to actually *clearly show* my equation during this presentation in
Santa Fe, NM .. at the end of this month (Sept. 2000). I suspect, however, that he probably is intending to barely even (if at all) mention my name, in-connection-with this "revelation/proof" he has now
announced that he will be presenting. I also suspect that he may try to "show" the equation as a mere "side-bar"
or "caption" on a video screen, such that the print is so incredibly tiny
.. the numbers can't be read, anyway.
Anyway ... here is my equation .. so at least you'll have it, now ..
(2.368705056 / 5.411616169) X (360 / 2000) = 0.07878735239
There, on the right-hand side of
the equation, you have The White House .. I mean; a decimal harmonic of my Grid POINT Value (Morton, 1998) for The White House .. "7.878735239".
On the left-hand side of the equation .. you have
(the Grid POINT Value of SIRIUS divided-by the Grid POINT Value of The Washington Monument) ... *TIMES* ... (the designated 'number' for MERIDIANS divided-by the 'number' of the New Year as of midnight last New Year's
Eve).
Do you recall the Clintons, last New Year's Eve at midnight on national television, gazing toward The Washington Monument as it 'burst' into a blazing, bright light as the clock struck 12 ? Do you know
where SIRIUS was in our sky, at that moment ?
I heard Robert Ghostwolf say, on "Coast to Coast AM" .. sharing the stage with Richard Hoagland the other night .. that MATHEMATICS was so important,
now, in what we need to be learning, etc. .. as the new-paradigm-time approaches. I agree. These numbers ... these correlations .. self-evident in the numbers .. in the math relating to a precise Pi constant, to The
Radian (deg) of 57.29577951 arc-degrees, to the "360" arc-degrees on one complete circumference, to the 25920 years of the Earth precession cycle, to the 5280 regular British Feet in a statute mile, to the
21,600 nautical miles on the polar circunference of Earth, to the Phi constant of HALF the Cosine of 36, to the "1/3rd of 22" arc-degrees in the "un-zip" angle of DNA/RNA structure .. all of this is
very, very, very important. Yes.
So .. one would think .. yes, it would seem "important", in fact .. that this "Santa Fe Conclave" coming-up at the end of this month .. should have, as
part of "The Panel" .. someone who has been actually *doing most of the work* of putting-together all of these *mathematical* methodologies, specific multiple-correlations, and various other particulars
.. combining the works of such people as Carl Munck, Bruce Cathie, David Wood, Erol Torun, Richard Hoagland, etc. .. someone who has actually .. specifically and precisely .. correlated the 'ground locations' on Earth
and Mars .. with 'star-positions' in our sky. Someone who, in addition .. has precisely correlated the crop formation locations with those 'monuments' and with those 'star-positions' in our sky. Someone who has actually
"figured-out" some basic, relevant, 'cool stuff' about .. "as above, so below". Right ?
Well ... I must say .. I have received no invitations to be included on "The Panel" of this
'Santa Fe Conclave'.
Are the people on that panel going to be able to really "show" .. or are they really going to be able to "explain" .. the basics, or the intricacies, of the *mathematics*
.. involved in the 'knowing' and in the 'understanding' of these major facets involved in the needed new paradigm ?
Frankly, I seriously doubt it.
One of the most brilliant, good-hearted people I have
ever met .. even though via the phone .. Mary Anne Weaver .. has been totally ignored by Richard Hoagland since late 1998 .. since just-after she had 'worked her butt off' .. for MONTHS .. writing and re-writing
.. and re-writing several more times .. that very excellent statistical paper for him (for no pay, of course). She couldn't be on the Art Bell show with Richard the night they originally scheduled .. so naturally,
you'd think she would have been re-scheduled with Richard for another time. Right ? No .. she was *never* re-scheduled. And .. Richard never got back to her.
I went to Miami in mid-February of 1999 .. to see The
Miami Circle, and to meet with Richard. He had gotten in touch with me by phone in late December/early January of 1999 ... asking me if I had the lat/long coordinates of The Miami Circle, etc. I said I was working on it
.. I had just ordered the official USGS topo map of Miami. Lo and behold .. Richard was getting very involved in The Miami Circle scenario, and he even was able to get GPS readings and phone them to me during the
first week of February, 1999. He was even good enough to have me on as one of several guests on Art Bell's show, concerning the effort to save The Miami Circle, the night of Feb. 4th, 1999. His GPS readings proved to be
quite accurate .. they helped me a lot, in figuring-out
the correct 'matrix' numbers for the precise location of The Miami Circle. I was glad, and excited, and I was pleased to be on Art Bell's show with Richard for
an hour .. I got to talk for about 10 minutes, considering "news-byte" breaks and commercials .. well; better than nothing.
Well .. that was the last time I was on "Coast to Coast
AM". In fact .. that's the last time I've been on any radio show, TV show .. anything. I actually thought I did quite well on that short Art Bell segment, especially considering it was my first time on the
air. I emailed Art Bell several times .. and I've emailed the new producer for Mike Siegel ... no response. Never a response.
I've written much material regarding 'The Miami Circle' since that time in late
Winter of 1999. I found "Miami Square", for example !! I figured-out the 'matrix' numbers for "The Well of OSIRIS" at the southwest corner of "Miami Square" !! Has Hoagland ever commented
on 'those' findings, on Art Bell .. or on the Siegel show ? No !! I figured-out the "Tetrahedral Grid LAT" .. which I've written about a lot on The Internet .. based DIRECTLY on Hoagland's
"Tetrahedral Latitude" ... 8760.48194 north/south .. a major 'matrix' number .. = 19 (deg) X 28 (min) X 16.46707132 (sec) north/south. That's "19.47122061" (deg) expressed in *matrix format* !! Has
Hoagland ever once mentioned 'that' on Art Bell's program, or on Siegel's show ? No !! So .. does Hoagland think I'm some sort of freak .. looney .. 'wild man', or something ? Too much of a weirdo for him to
be associated with ? Yeah .. my hair was pretty long when I met him in Miami .. but it's a lot shorter now. My beard's even shorter, too. I was quite 'articulate' on that short Art Bell segment in Feb. of '99, so 'that'
issue should be of no concern. OK ... I do occasionally 'giggle' (laugh) .. sort of wildly, even, at certain times .. but its nothing 'extreme' (the vast majority of the time, anyway). Sense of humor, you know.
Heh-heh.
So ... I have to think that Hoagland, Ghostwolf, and Company ... actually 'many' people in this "new paradigm biz" .. simply *want the whole stage to themselves* .. bottom-line. They want
to be *the stars of the show* .. period. No "room" for others, except for some 'non-threatening' supporting role-players. Their egos are paramount. They don't want someone like me to "outshine" them,
which I could easily do at almost any given moment. How ? Because I'm the one who has done the work !!! So .. I guess I'm a "threat" to them. To their overly-inflated egos, that is. They don't want
me on any stage .. especially on the same stage with *them*. They can have the damn stage .. as long as they actually present my work properly .. and correctly .. and clearly .. and not in "tiny
print" as some side-bar or caption, so you can't even read it. And as long as they give me proper credit as their source for any 'knowledge or wisdom' that came from my mind and from my work. And as long as
they *really know* the damn material !! If they don't "really" know what
they're talking about, they should at least have someone up there, sitting on the panel .. who does!!!
It's time that I
stood-up for myself, to the likes of Richard Hoagland and Robert Ghostwolf, and such characters. They have done some good works .. they have pioneered some popular awareness of some important aspects of a badly-needed
new paradigm. But they have done some people a lot of serious wrong .. from a lack of honesty, a lack of ethics, and a general lack of integrity. And in so doing .. they do not set a good universal example for a new
paradigm .. and they prevent and suppress the best information and knowledge from being effectively disseminated.
-- Michael Lawrence Morton
(c) 2000 |
|
