
In a message dated 10/02/2000 7:30:56 PM Pacific Daylight Time, bcornet@monmouth.com writes:
<< Dear Michael,
You state on your web page
entitled Bulletin #5: "For that matter ... WHY did he do 'nothing' with this information, after I sent it to him in Spring of 1998 ? I've asked him about that, via email...
and he has not replied to my satisfaction.
I also sent him very significant figures for "The D&M Pyramid II" ... etc.
Well ... I think he got scared ... and/or was "gottento" by someone.
He could have been seriously threatened."
Actually, the reason why the Cydonia II webpage was archived and made
inaccessible is because it was hurting my chances at making inroads (friends) at JPL and NASA with engineers and scientists, who hold strong opinions about the Cydonia features and face on Mars. In short, my
Cydonia II webpage made me look like a kook! They suggested that I remove it. I thought it was a good suggestion, and complied.
The reason why I never took advantage of your information, which still intrigues me,
is that even the slightest error in measurement will throw any calculations to NINE DECIMAL PLACES!!!! off to the point that those numbers are meaningless. So, there is no way that you could prove their significance
unless you could show that your measurement process is infallible to nine decimal places. In any scientific endeavor, you must take into account standard deviation and margin for error. Because you didn't, I had no
trust in your results, as exciting as they might be.
Thought I should answer your questions so that you do not think that some spooks or perps got me :)
Yours truly, Bruce Cornet, Ph.D.
Geologist, Paleobotanist, and Palynologist bcornet@monmouth.com ~http://www.monmouth.com/~bcornet/
27 Tower Hill Ave. Red Bank, NJ 07701 7327479244 >>
Hi Bruce ... I'm glad to hear from you.
Thankyou for letting me know the reason
for your taking down the "Cydonia Analogue" material. It was quite disturbing to me, when I saw that you were removing that material, and that you were issuing a "retraction" regarding the material.
Again .. I appreciate your emailingme with your reason for it.
I can understand your problem with the 9 decimal places .. the figures in my work are not quantitatively justified, in the currentlyaccepted
'scientific method' .. and I can understand this. However, I do maintain that I have qualitatively justified my work. By that, I mean the descriptions of several significant correlations, specifically regarding the
"Grid Matrix" numbers of "Earthface" (Face II), the "Tholus II", and the "D&M II".
For example .. the "25920" Grid LONG (W.Giza) of "Earthface"
(Face II) .. is a very conspicuous figure, of course .. the Earth precession cycle in years. And the Grid POINT Value of "Earthface" .. 1.234567901 ... is also a very 'conspicuous' figure .. indicating both
the "Square" of 1.111111111 .. and also the integers of our base 10 system (minus the "8", only because of my use of 10 digits in the Square Root) ... which is 1.111111111, of course, and which is
ALSO the apparent Grid POINT Value of "Tholus II". As you can see, I am *qualitatively* showing, here, a set of very direct, very specific, and very 'significant' .. correlations.
{ 1.11111111 X 1.11111111 = 1.234567899 }.
Further .. the Grid LONG of "Earthface" .. 25920 .. is very directly .. and very *conspicuously* resonant .. with the Grid POINT Value (Munck, 1992) of 'The
Face' at Cydonia (656.56127) on Mars ... 25920 / 656.56127 = 39.4784176 .. exactly (2Pi) Squared.
This is mainly to point out that the "quality of information" is very important in this work.
Bruce ... thanks, again, for emailing. Sincerely, Michael Lawrence Morton Re: Possible major discovery ..
<< Subj: Re: Rosslyn Chapel ... Date: 10/04/2000 9:56:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: H.Isenberg@ping.de
(Holger Isenberg) To: Milamo@aol.com
According to this map ..
http://www.rosslynchapel.org.uk/images/rmap.gif
and the most probable address "1 Chapel Loan" it should be at the red marker position of the attached mapblastpicture at the coordinates 55.856 N, 3.161 W (coords. of red cross)  Holger Isenberg
H.Isenberg@ping.de http://marsnews.de >>
 Holger ... You are (again) the first to hear of this. I am so everthankful to you for your great help in this !!
I've been working with the coordinates you sent
me, for the likely location of Rosslyn Chapel, in Scotland.Here (following) is a kind of rough summary of what I have just found, during the last few hours or so, as I write this.
Grid LAT 55 (deg) X 51 (min) X 21.60294024 (sec) North .. = 60596.24736 North. Grid LONG 34 (deg) X 17 (min) X 40.4466814 (sec) W.Giza .. = 23378.18185 W.Giza. [ W.Greenwich 03 deg 09 min 39.6466814 sec ]. Grid
POINT Value 60596.24736 / 23378.18185 = 2.592
NOTES : ** Grid POINT Value is a decimal harmonic of the Earth precession cycle in years of 25920. ** Grid LONG is a numerical match of the Grid LAT of
the 'Pyramid of the Sun' at Teotihuacan, Mexico (Munck, 1992) .. "23378.18185 N." .. = 19 (deg) X 41 (min) X 30.01050302 (sec) North. ** Grid LAT, when divided by my Grid LAT for the BONNE MARE
(France) precise location, gives the result of a numerical match of the multiplied product of the Grid POINT Values of Chartres Cathedral and Rosslyn Chapel .. 60596.24736 / 18361.1811 = 3.300236899 = (1.273239545
X 2.592). { Recall my figures for the Bonne Mare site latitude .. 18361.1811 North .. = 49 (deg) X 20 (min) X 18.73589908 (sec) North }.
Other Significant Correlations ..
Re: "Dragon Mound" ..
in Granville, Ohio, USA. I recently became aware that "Alligator Mound" in Granville, Ohio (USA) is actually a stylized effigydepiction of a "dragon" .. a very ancient emblem/symbol for
'kingship' and for 'enlightenment'. On drawings of this effigy mound, it will be noted that there is an "enigmatic extra appendage" attached to the body of the 'creature'. In my opinion, this obviously must be
the "backfin" of the dragon. I can't reasonably attribute the "extra appendage" to anything else.
Part of my recent work, using Carl Munck's figures for this effigy mound (which he calls
"Squirrel Mound") as a startingpoint .. involved my finding that the *precise fractional number of arcseconds* in the centered latitude of this mound .. is a decimal harmonic of the Grid POINT Value I had
found for the star ALPHA DRACONIS, circa 2000 A.D.
The Grid LAT for "Dragon Mound" (as I now call it; Morton, 2000) is .. 1890.896457 North .. = 40 (deg) X 04 (min) X 11.81810286 (sec)
North. If you go to that Url given directly above, you will note that my Grid POINT Value for circa 2000 A.D. ALPHA DRACONIS .. is .. 1.181810286 .. so you can see the exact decimal harmonic, there.
** The
figure "3.300236899" .. recall, above .. as the multiplied product of the Grid POINT Values of Chartres Cathedral (Morton, 2000) and Rosslyn Chapel (Morton, 2000) ... is ALSO equal to .. (189.0896457 /
57.29577951). Notice that you have, here, a decimal harmonic of the Grid LAT of "Dragon Mound" .. dividedby The Radian (deg).
** Further .. my Grid POINT Value for "Dragon Mound" is ..
10.90830783 .. = (36 / 3.300236899). There, you have the number 36 .. very related to,and resonant with, the Golden Section. The Cosine of 36 (deg) is precisely HALF the Phi constant ..
COS 36 = 0.809016994 = (1.618033989 / 2).
I also want to point out something else about the figure 3.300236899 .. notice the horizontal order of the digits : "33" .. then a 'break' or 'separation' of
"00" .. then; "2368" .. an important ancient "gematrialike" number, meaning "Jesus Christ", according to many scholarly sources such as the work of John Michell. The
"33" can refer to the year in which Jesus Christ was "crucified", when he was age 40 (see L.Gardner; "Bloodline of The Holy Grail"). And "99" ?? ... if you divide the TANGENT
of the 'Tetrahedral Latitude' (R.C.Hoagland) into "33" .. 33 / 0.333333333 = 99. { TAN 19.47122061 (deg) = 0.333333333 }. Also ... 9 + 9 = 18 ... which is HALF of 36. And .. 9 X 9 = 81 .. which is
the mirrorimage of 18. Then .. 81  18 = 63 .. the year in which Mary Magdalene died (Gardner). AND .. 81 + 18 = 99. { 99  63 = 36 }. Plus .. 99 + 63 = 162 .. Bruce Cathie's lightspeed decimal harmonic
in nautical miles per second (162000).
'Ratio' of Chartres Cathedral and Rosslyn Chapel
If you take that ratio .. 2.592 / 1.273239545 = 2.035752039 .. which is ALSO the ratio of .. (36 / 17.68388257). My
Grid POINT Value for the BONNE MARE (France) site .. is .. 1.768388257 .. yet another decimal harmonic match.
Further .. 2.035752039 = 3.141592654 X 0.648. That's exactly Pi times a decimal harmonic of the
Grid LONG that I found for the site at Bethlehem .. 648 E.Giza .. = 04 (deg) X 03 (min) X 54 (sec) E.Giza. { Also .. refer to "The Harmonic Conquest of Space", by Bruce Cathie, page 109 }. And notice the
specific number of arcseconds in that E.Giza longitude. "54" ... Sine of 54 (deg) = HALF Phi = Cosine of 36 (deg). {
http://www.topcities.com/OuterSpace/farshores/farshores/rennes.htm }.
 Michael Lawrence Morton (c) 2000 P.S. You are encouraged to copy and to forward this article to others, provided everything is copied in its entirety, with no alterations. Thanks  MLM.

